跳转至

Contents

1 - Definition Clearification

This chapter provides a brief introduction to the terminologies involved in semantics.

2 - Logics & Formal Semantics

This chapter first introduces the semiotics in formal semantics (which adopts a similar system with that in the logics). It then discusses about the semantics in two perspectives: the propositional logic and the predicate logic. It also introduces several basic rules in logic inference.

3 - Scope Ambiguity

This chapter discusses on the unsolved questions in scope ambiguity.

Grading

mid-term: 35%

final: 50%

participation: 15%

Two tests

Two tests will be given during the term, one in the middle and one at the end of the term, covering all the material covered up to that point in the course. The tests will be a combination of various types of questions, including true/false and short essay.

Final Review & For Fun

:material-circle-edit-outline: 约 629 个字 :material-clock-time-two-outline: 预计阅读时间 2 分钟

The following parts are written in preparation for the final review but I upload it as well for you to read for fun.

Noble Semanticians

Name Field Contribution Live Nation Institution Fun facts
Noam Chomsky mainly in syntax generative grammar, transformational grammar, government and binding theory, minimalist program, productivity of language, recursivity of language 1928- USA MIT Most prominent linguist alive
Ferdinand de Saussure linguist and semiotician founder of semiotics. concepts: sign, signifier vs. signified, diachronic vs. synchronic, language vs. parole, paradigmatic vs. syntagmatic 1857-1913 Switzerland University of Geneva, Switzerland
Charles Sanders Peirce philosopher, mathematician, logician founder of semiotics. concepts: index, icon, symbol. 1839-1914 Milford Pennsylvania JHU
Michel Bréal comparative grammar coined the term “semantics”, diachronic focus 1832-1915 born in Rheinlan (Germany), studied in Paris and Berlin in Paris
Leonard Bloomfield structural linguistics structural linguistics, language as a self-regulating system, behaviorism(stimulus-response testing) 1887-1949 Yale University reject introspection
Aristotle polymath term logic, initiator of western scientific tradition 384-322 BC Stagira, Greece tutor of Alexander the Great
Gottlob Freg philosopher, logician, mathematician predicate logic, sense(sentence’s proposition) vs. reference (its truth value) 1848-1925 German University of Jena extreme right-wing views
Peter Geach philosopher, professor of logic donkey sentence (1962) 1916-2013 England Oxford
Richard Montegue semanticist Montegue grammar: syntax and semantics go together 1930-1971 student of Alfred Tarski, gay man, killed in his apartment, four influential papers
Gareth Evans philosopher philosophy of mind, work on reference, e-type anaphora 1946-1980 England Oxford
Irene Heim semanticist definite and indefinite pronouns 1954- German, Munich MIT, phd 1982 advisor: Barbara Partee
Hans Kamp philosopher and linguist discourse representation theory (DRT) 1954- Dutch
Bertrand Russell philosopher, logician logic, philosophy of mathematician 1872-1970 Wales, Britain Cambridge
Henriëtte de Swart linguist tense and aspect, negation, bare nominals and indefinite noun phrases. She has also investigated the role of semantics in language evolution, and was involved in the development of bidirectional optimality theory. 1961- Dutch director of Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics and Utrecht Institute of Linguistics

Example questions

What is a donkey pronoun?

A donkey sentence is such that an expected existential is interpreted as universal taking wide scope.

What is a discourse pronoun:

outside the scope of existing quantifier
e.g. No student studies semantics. He is outside.

The scope of a quantifier is always bound in the clause it appears.

 True

What is quantifier raising?

Chmosky and May.
LF, 

What are De Morgan’s laws?

~(p or q) <=> (~p) and (~q)
~(p and q) <=> (~p) or (~q)

What are conditional laws

p -> q <=> ~p or q

When is the indefinite “a” not an existential quantifier?

1. donkey sentence
2. generic noun phrase. A woman is difficult to please. \forall x(Wx -> Dx)
3. John is a plumber.pj

2 readings: Some boy smiled at Jane and some boy kissed Molly.

\exist x(Bx and Sx,j and Kx,m)
\exist x(Bx and Sx,j) and \forall y(By and Ky,m)

2 Types of Recursion

embedding and coordination